点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
东西问丨短评：为何越处于两岸关系低谷，越要疾呼民间交流？******
中新社北京12月30日电 题：为何越处于两岸关系低谷，越要疾呼民间交流？
中新社记者 杨程晨
2022年是“九二共识”达成30周年，也是两岸开启交流往来的第35年。这一年，台湾社会民心求变求新。“思”字在有关两岸关系的年度汉字评选中高票当选，其背后是同胞的异地相思，真挚寄望交流恢复、人员往来。
8月27日，2022年全球华侨华人促进中国和平统一大会在四川举行。中新社记者 韩海丹 摄台湾位于祖国东南，故称“登陆”发展为西进。两岸打破政治阻隔的民间往来始于1987年，台湾的大陆籍老兵返乡探亲的呼声得以实现。自此，海峡不再成为阻碍，两岸民众进入共振时间，交流合作逾趋热络，西进蔚然成风。及至后来两岸各领域融合发展不断深化。
一个“思”字，反映的是两岸民众对于局势的现实心境。
回首2022，在台湾“九合一”选举、佩洛西窜访以及台美频密勾连的背景下，台海局势暗潮汹涌，两岸关系多次面临风高浪急的挑战。针对外部干涉之举，大陆方面坚决反制，在政治、经济、外交、法律及军事方面强力震慑分裂及干涉势力。中共二十大所展现的反分裂、反干涉决心彰显人民意志。
即便受到民进党当局阻挠和新冠疫情的不利影响，两岸民众希望交流合作、和平发展的呼声从未减弱。无论从当前、还是长远看，大陆依旧是台湾发展最坚实的倚靠，大陆高质量发展的持续推进为两岸经贸往来提供了新机遇。台湾工商团体跨海赴交流、台湾民众至盼“小三通”彻底重启，基层期待互动的真实声音正在放大，被更多人听见。
道阻且长，行则将至。大陆方面坚定致力于促进两岸经济文化交流合作，深化两岸各领域融合发展，是为和平统一打造更广阔的民众基础，为两岸关系铺垫长久基石。两岸关系的前路仍有风浪、风险。即便如此，两岸交流、特别是民众之间的往来都不应中断。这是两岸主流民意的真实反映。
福建省漳州古城里的“台湾路”老街彰显漳台两地的历史渊源。龚雯 摄一则例证是，尽管近年两岸青年交流颇为不易，但台湾学生西进热情不减。通过交换生项目到大陆的台生活跃于两岸社交媒体上，客观展现大陆生活。他们对中新社记者说，将在大陆的经历视作难能可贵的人生“加分项”，“无论是回到台湾还是留在大陆，都是很好的参照和铺垫”。
待疫情阴霾逐渐散去，当务之急就是排除干扰、克服障碍，尽快恢复两岸民间各领域、全方位、深层次的交流往来。让两岸同胞在交流融合中看清事实、认清真相，越来越多、越来越深地投身于两岸融合发展的大潮。
12月2日，第十届海峡青年节“黄巷·两岸青年文化交流周”活动在福州市三坊七巷黄巷启幕，台湾台中市同期举行。吕明 摄所谓“相见情已深，未语可知心”，越是在有人离间同胞感情、煽动同胞敌对之时，越能看出两岸同胞骨肉天亲的可贵；越是处于两岸关系的低谷、险境，越需珍视交流，越要呼吁往来。
兄弟既翕，和乐且湛。血脉的连结是两岸关系相向而行最持续的动力。年度汉字评选寄托两岸民众的新年愿望，折射的是两岸同胞的共同期盼。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)